Question by Chase: What say you about having a third political party in the United States to breakaway from its two-party system?
I believe there needs to be a third political party now more more than ever. It would breakaway from the Republican party. The newly-formed party would consist of true conservatives and libertarians such as Sen Rand Paul and Sen Ted Cruz, while the Republican party would retain its neocons such as Sen John McCain and Sen Lindsey Graham.

These neocons want are war, involvement in foreign affairs, amnesty of millions of illegal aliens, the works. They are internationalists. The War in Afghanistan should have been finished just a few years after we entered; we shouldn’t still be in Afghanistan over 10 years later. And the Iraq War was never necessary to enter. Never.

Meanwhile, people love to bash the likes of Sen Rand Paul and even more so his father Rep Ron Paul by calling them isolationists. These men are not “isolationists”, they are “non-interventionists”. Read about here the differences between isolationism and non-interventionism:

Isolationism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolationism

Non-interventionism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-interventionism

Founding Fathers such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were non-interventionists. That is to say, they opposed involvement in European wars and affairs while still maintaining free trade with Europe. To put this into a modern day perspective, this would mean that we the United States would oppose involvement in World wars and affairs while still maintaining free trade and legal immigration.

Thus, the neocons within the Republican party, which are the vast majority of them, are no better than the Democratic party in that the Republican party wants bigger government in the form of military while the Democratic party wants bigger government in the form of a welfare and entitlement. That is why these neocons are Republican Only In Name (RINO), and that is why there needs to be a third political party.

What say you about having a third political party in the United States to breakaway from its two-party system?
Let me say to EB3 and Chris, in regards to having no party affiliation, that I would be completely in favor of having no political parties and simply the people vote for who is truly the best candidate running instead of voting party lines.

If we are going to have a party-system, there needs to be at least a third major political party. In the end, though, I would say that no party affiliation would be the absolute best way to go in politics.

As it was meant to be when this nation started.

Best answer:

Answer by Blowhard is still Dead
Go for it, waste your vote

What do you think? Answer below!

 

 

Sam Davis and Matt Brown – Interventionists | Freedom Interventions – An interview with Sam Davis and Matt Brown, interventionists from Freedom Interventions http://www.interventionservicesinc.com.

 

Explainer: Fiscal hawks vs. fiscal doves

Filed under: interventionists

The fiscal dove is the interventionist: He or she argues that we should pump money aggressively into the system, borrow as much as we can, and spend our way to recovery. The fiscal hawk, on the other hand, is much more reticent. He or she argues …
Read more on Marketplace.org

 

Eric Cantor Lies About the Iran Deal | The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and …

Filed under: interventionists

The US foreign policy establishment, infested as it is by interventionists of the Left and Right, simply make up new rules as they go along, insisting that the US is not to be bound by said rules. The US is the exceptional nation; rules are for the …
Read more on Iranian